🔗 Share this article

The biggest shock the movie business has encountered in 2025? The comeback of horror as a dominant force at the UK film market.

As a style, it has impressively outperformed past times with a annual growth of 22% for the UK and Irish box office: over £83 million this year, versus £68,612,395 in 2024.

“Previously, zero horror films made £10 million in the UK or Ireland. Currently, five have surpassed that mark,” says a cinema revenue expert.

The big hits of the year – a recent horror title (£11.4 million), Sinners (£16.2 million), the latest Conjuring installment (£14.98 million) and 28 Years Later (£15.54m) – have all hung about in the theaters and in the audience's minds.

While much of the expert analysis centers on the unique excellence of certain directors, their successes point to something shifting between moviegoers and the category.

“I’ve heard people say, ‘Even if you don’t like horror this is a film you need to see,’” explains a content buying lead.

“Films like these play with genre and structure to create something completely different, and that speaks to an audience in a different way.”

But apart from aesthetic quality, the ongoing appeal of horror movies this year implies they are giving cinemagoers something that’s much needed: therapeutic relief.

“Right now, there’s a lot of anger, fear and division that’s being reflected in cinema,” says a film commentator.

“Horror films are great at playing into people’s anxieties, while at the same time exaggerating them. So you forget about your day-to-day anxieties and focus on the monster on the screen,” remarks a respected writer of classic monster stories.

Amid a current events featuring war, border tensions, far-right movements, and environmental crises, supernatural beings and undead creatures strike a unique chord with viewers.

“It’s been noted that vampire cinema thrives during periods of economic hardship,” says an actress from a successful fright film.

“It’s the idea that capitalism sucks the life out of people.”

Historically, public discord has always impacted scary movies.

Analysts reference the rise of early cinematic styles after the the Great War and the chaotic atmosphere of the early Weimar Republic, with features such as early expressionist works and a pioneering fright film.

Subsequently came the Great Depression era and classic monster movies.

“The classic example is Dracula: you get this invasion of Britain by someone from eastern Europe who then causes this infection that gets spread in all sorts of ways and threatens the Anglo-Saxon heroes,” notes a historian.

“Therefore, it embodies concerns related to foreign influx.”

The boogeyman of border issues inspired the just-premiered rural fright a recent film title.

Its writer-director clarifies: “I aimed to delve into populist rhetoric. Specifically, calls to restore a mythical past that favored a privileged few.”

“Secondly, the idea that you could be with someone you know and then suddenly they blurt out something round the dinner table or in a Facebook post and you’re like, ‘Where did that come from?’”

Arguably, the current era of celebrated, politically engaged fright cinema commenced with a brilliant satire launched a year after a polarizing administration.

It introduced a recent surge of horror auteurs, including a range of talented artists.

“It was a hugely exciting time,” recalls a director whose film about a murderous foetus was one of the period's key works.

“I think it was the beginning of an era when people were opening up to doing a really bonkers horror film which had arthouse aspirations.”

This creator, now penning a fresh horror script, notes: “During the past decade, viewers have become more receptive to such innovative approaches.”

Concurrently, there has been a revival of the genre’s less celebrated output.

In recent months, a nicke l venue opened in a major city, showing underground films such as The Greasy Strangler, a classic adaptation and the modern reinterpretation of Dr Caligari.

The re-appreciation of this “raw and chaotic” genre is, according to the theater owner, a direct reaction to the formulaic productions churned out at the cinemas.

“This responds to the sterile output from major studios. Today's cinema is safer and more repetitive. Many popular movies feel identical,” he states.

“Conversely, [such movies] appear raw. As if they emerged straight from the artist's mind, untouched by studio control.”

Fright flicks continue to disrupt conventions.

“Horror possesses a dual nature, feeling both classic and current simultaneously,” notes an specialist.

In addition to the re-emergence of the mad scientist trope – with multiple versions of a well-known story upcoming – he forecasts we will see scary movies in 2026 and 2027 addressing our modern concerns: about artificial intelligence control in the coming decades and “vampires living in the Trump tower”.

In the interim, a biblical fright story The Carpenter’s Son – which tells the story of Mary and Joseph’s struggles after the nativity, and stars famous performers as the divine couple – is scheduled to debut in the coming months, and will undoubtedly create waves through the Christian right in the United States.</