🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate atomic talks with Washington as long as it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue worked, and revealed recent overtures had come from intermediaries to restart talks with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is treading a difficult path since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more powerful in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Earlier Talks Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, EU nations used their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Offered

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was settled an local partnership with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could function on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Diplomats asserted three times they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Status

Iranian officials said the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the proposal could be resurrected in some form if negotiations resume.

The American leader last week claimed he had been getting signals that Iran desired to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his speech to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a dominant force that abuses the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister declared the 12-day war showed the conflict could not be settled by military means. He said the attacks began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making confidence difficult to reestablish.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Solution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly sought to enforce their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and stays the primary resolution to address conflicts, but its criteria, rules and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will receive a answer in the identical tone."

Repair and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned numerous insights from this conflict; we have come to know our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He stated: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to destroy, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but did not succeed to shatter. The Iranian people have become stronger, more integrated, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the wake of this invasion."