🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for companies – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker earning moderate income pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I know multiple clients who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like much of federal military, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.